Blog

  • Children Don’t Ruin Women’s Careers-Husbands Do, Harvard Study Finds

    Children Don’t Ruin Women’s Careers-Husbands Do, Harvard Study Finds

    goodbyesocialconstructs:

    A
    new study of Harvard Business School graduates from HBS’s Robin Ely and
    Colleen Ammerman and Hunter College sociologist Pamela Stone shows that
    high-achieving women are not meeting the career goals they set for
    themselves in their 20s. It’s not because they’re “opting out” of the
    workforce when they have kids, but because they’re allowing their
    partners’ careers to take precedence over their own.

    The study’s
    authors interviewed 25,000 men and women who graduated from Harvard
    Business School over the past several decades. The male graduates were
    much more likely to be in senior management positions and have more
    responsibility and more direct reports than their female peers. But why?
    It’s not because women are leaving the workforce en masse. The authors
    found, definitively, that the “opt-out” explanation is a myth. Among Gen
    X and baby boomers they surveyed, only 11 percent of women left the
    workforce to be full-time moms. That figure is lower for women of
    colour—only 7 percent stopped working. The vast majority (74 percent) of
    Gen Xers, women who are currently 32-48 and in the prime of their
    child-rearing years, work full time, an average of 52 hours a week.

    But
    while these women are still working, they are also making more
    unexpected sacrifices than their male classmates are. When they
    graduated, more than half of male HBS grads said they expected their
    careers would take precedence over their partners’. Only 7 percent of
    Gen X women and 3 percent of baby boomer women said they expected their
    careers to take precedence. Here’s what they did expect: The majority of
    women said they assumed they would have egalitarian marriages in which
    both spouses’ careers were taken equally seriously.

    A lot of
    those women were wrong.
    About 40 percent of Gen X and boomer women said
    their spouses’ careers took priority over theirs, while only about 20
    percent of them had planned on their careers taking a back seat. Compare
    that with the men: More than 70 percent of Gen X and boomer men say
    their careers are more important than their wives’. When you look at
    child care responsibilities, the numbers are starker. A full 86 percent
    of Gen X and boomer men said their wives take primary responsibility for
    child care, and the women agree: 65 percent of Gen X women and 72
    percent of boomer women—all HBS grads, most of whom work—say they’re the
    ones who do most of the child care in their relationships.

    Of
    course, marital arrangements aren’t the only force holding women back.
    Part of the reason these women aren’t advancing at the same rate as
    their male counterparts is that after they have kids, they get
    “mommy-tracked.”
    In many ways, they’re not considered management
    candidates anymore. “They may have been stigmatized for taking advantage
    of flex options or reduced schedules, passed over for high-profile
    assignments, or removed from projects they once led,” the authors note.
    Other studies support these findings, as they have shown that there is a
    real, substantial motherhood penalty that involves lower pay and fewer
    promotions for women with kids, because employers assume they will be
    less dedicated to their jobs
    (as do, we now know, their husbands).

    But
    the personal piece of the female achievement gap puzzle is important,
    and it’s something that’s very difficult to shift. The study’s authors
    note that while millennial HBS grads are a little more egalitarian than
    their older peers, half of the youngest men still assume that their
    careers will take precedence, and two-thirds of them assume their
    spouses will do the majority of child care.

    Important info, but I hate the way this was written.

    “It’s not because they’re “opting out” of the
    workforce when they have kids, but because they’re allowing their
    partners’ careers to take precedence over their own.
    “ but because they have self-indulgent patriarchal male partners that encourage and expect them to give up their career dreams in favor of catering to their families, something the men themselves are too self-entitled and lazy to do.

    Also big shoutout to all those millennial male HBS grads that are still patriarchal and entitled. And by shoutout I mean fuck you.

  • transrants:

    gravekat:

    softkats:

    pizzatomb:

    aside from being cissexist the whole XX = female and XY = male thing is Straight-Up Wrong

    AFAB people can have XO, XXX, XXXX and XY chromosomes while AMAB people have have XXYY, XYY, and XX chromosomes and since the majority of the population never has their karyotype examined,  they’ll never know that they have one of these chromosomal quirks unless that specific combination has associated symptoms, and not all of them do. you could literally have one of the aforementioned combinations without even knowing it and meanwhile you’re insisting that all AFAB people are XX and that anyone else who has this must also be female

    we could also talk about how hormonal patterns for XX persons can naturally and biologically mirror that of a typical XY person, or vis versa, which gives rise to things like androgen insensitivity disorder. here u have it, folks, an whole group of intersex people who have XY chromosomes and testicles and vulva and vagina, all grown naturally, all at the same time. 

    the number of people who are intersex mirror the number of people who are born with red hair, but no one goes around trying to say that red isn’t a natural hair colour just because the phenotype doesn’t manifest in the majority of the population. 

    #hmmmm it’s almost like the gender binary is a piece of shit

    seriously consider the bold if you are aggressively upholding the ridiculously flawed theory that is the sex and gender binary.

  • medievalpoc:

    searlait:

    hathor-aroha:

    lifeisliterallylimited:

    I AM SO BLOODY FURIOUS:

    Three-year-old Aboriginal girl left in tears after she is racially abused by a grown woman for wearing her favourite Frozen costume

    • Samara Muir, 3, had dressed up as Queen Elsa from Disney film Frozen
    • The little girl wore the outfit to a Disney event in Melbourne
    • She was racially abused by a mother and her two daughters
    • ‘Black is ugly’ the three-year-old was told by one of the other girls
    • Samara was so upset she would not go to her Aboriginal dance class
    • When her mother asked why she replied: ‘It’s because I’m black’

    This is why people who seem to need “proof from history” that WE NEED MORE DIVERSE REPRESENTATION IN FANTASY piss me off so much. People of color get harassed at Renaissance Faires, at SCA events, in online fandoms, at LARPs, and events based entirely on fantasy and fairy tale stories, because supposedly “there were no PoC back then”.

    That’s a lie, and it’s wrapped in another lie.

    Despite that fact that Disney’s Frozen has nothing to do with actual history, people still have asked me over and over again about it. Because they want “proof” that it should have been more diverse. 

    I really don’t get why anyone would need any more “proof” than the fact that a 3 year old child was told “Black is ugly” at a Disney event because she was dressed as Elsa.

    I really wonder if things would change if Frozen really had been based on media from historical Denmark, as a lot of the mistaken “historical accuracy” police had claimed it was. Maybe then people would have seen someone in Frozen, maybe even Elsa, who looked like Karel Van Mander III’s Queen Persina (from a series for the Royal Court in the 1600s):

    image
    image

    [The models for this series were Black people living in Denmark in the 1600s, if anyone was wondering.]

    But it’s not set in historical Denmark, or Norway, or “somewhere in Scandinavia”. It’s set in a 100% make-believe world with magic ice powers and sentient snowmen. 

    And in THIS world, the one we all live in, racist grown women attack toddlers for dressing up as characters who don’t look like them, when there are practically NO characters who DO look like them. 

    WE NEED DIVERSE REPRESENTATION.

    And we need it now.

  • Dinosaurs

    seananmcguire:

    animatedamerican:

    seananmcguire:

    animatedamerican:

    patrickat:

    Scientists say we’ll be able to clone actual dinosaurs by 2020. GoP says science knows nothing; we’ll be able to put an actual dinosaur in the White House as soon as January 2017.

    BUT LET’S NOT.

    BUT LET’S.

    allow me to clarify my position

    METAPHORICAL DINOSAUR IN THE WHITE HOUSE: LET’S NOT

    ACTUAL LITERAL FIRST PET DINOSAUR IN THE WHITE HOUSE: YES LET’S

    Ahhhhhhh yes okay.  I was going RAPTOR PRESIDENT, and let me tell you, I am ALL ABOUT raptor president’s State of the Union.

    “RARAHGHGHGHRHBFHGGGHHG!!!!”
    “OH GOD RAPTOR PRESIDENT JUST ATE CONGRESS!”

    …new representatives are elected, raptor president is fed, everyone wins.

  • postleft-propaganda:

    Immigration raid meets fierce resistance at East Street Market

    ‘Home Office immigration
    enforcement have been targeting the East Street market in Walworth,
    London SE17, all week, with no less than five raids over previous days.
    Today they came again at 5PM and snatched one man from a fish shop,
    presumably accused of working without legal documents.

    But this time, things were not going to go so easy
    for the thugs in blue. After call-outs went out through the local
    grapevine and also on social media, people from the area including the
    next door Aylesbury Estate rushed down to the scene. The Home Office
    snatch van was blockaded and penned in on a side street off the market.
    The bullies retreated inside the van with their prisoner while it was
    surrounded by people’s bodies and by makeshift barricades, the tires
    were let down, and it was pelted with rotten fruit and eggs from the
    market.

    The Home Office thugs called in police reinforcements. They arrived
    with six cars of cops, plus dog vans and plainclothes cops, and a
    helicopter circling overhead, as the street was cordoned off. However,
    the crowd kept on growing as more people from the estate and nearby
    streets joined in, local teenagers called up their mates, others arrived
    seeing it on social media.

    The stand off continued for over an hour, the local police clueless
    about what to do next. Then three vans of TSG riot cops arrived, tooled
    up in full body armour. The TSG pushed through, escorting the Home
    Office van limping out on deflated tires. They came under sustained
    attack as new barricades of street furniture kept getting thrown up to
    stop their progress and hails of rocks, bottles, road cones, etc., kept
    them at bay. At least one TSG cop was knocked to the floor, a riot van
    windscreen and other windows broken.

    In the end, they managed to get their prisoner out, and also took one
    more arrested from the resisters. After the immigration van had got out
    the crowd kept blocking the TSG vans with commercial rubbish bins and
    other barriers to continue
    the fighting. Eventually, visibly shaken by the angry mob,the TSG
    managed to escape. After giving them a rowdy send-off, the crowd danced
    to a mobile sound system.

    This was concerted angry action which brought together local
    teenagers, Aylesbury Estate residents, anarchists, and whoever was in
    the street and not going to take this shit lying down. If we could meet
    more raids with resistance like this it would seriously screw up the
    system of repression. This is the response we want to be growing on our
    streets, every day of the week.’

  • revolutionarykoolaid:

    Say their names. Remember them for more than the heinous act that stole their lives. They deserve that and so much more. #staywoke #farfromover

  • amuseoffyre:

    mayordog:

    look at this fucken idiot go

    this has changed my mental image of how the whole “Jesus walking on water” incident went…

  • taidstick:

    catsbeaversandducks:

    This Is Not My Cat

    Via Pleated-Jeans.com

    jamfisher

    I think these people are all confused. They keep using the wrong tense. The correct statement would be “I didn’t have a cat”… because they do now… :)

  • rememberwhenyoutried:

    When children bully other children, they often use the words and images given to them by television; they learned to single out a class of person and they learned the words to use against those people from their favourite shows.

    When TV shows aimed at children single out a particular class of person as the butt of a joke–for example, the man-in-a-dress sight gag beloved of cartoons since cartooning began–they are handing weapons to bullies.

    These shows are complicit in bullying and abuse.