ricktimus:

Neil deGrasse Tyson is not impressed with all your sexism.

Edit: This post made it to the Science tag! As a science aficionado, this of course makes me happy.

So lots of people have reblogged pointing out the irony that I didn’t even include the names of the scientists in my original post. This is mostly true. I did include their names on my post, but that was only in the tag section, and even then it was for my own reference purposes. Had I known this was going to be reblogged like mad and added to an educational category I, would have at least included links to their respective biographies and stuff, instead of only just my glib commentary.*

But that is what the edit feature is for, I suppose. SO HERE ARE SOME LINKS:

• Annie Jump Cannon
• Henrietta Swan
• Cecilia Payne

AND ALSO:

• Harvard Computers
• Edward Pickering
• Women in Astronomy

* Not that I will ever regret writing glib commentary about Neil deGrasse Tyson throwing some serious shade at the past.

ricktimus:

Neil deGrasse Tyson is not impressed with all your sexism.

Edit: This post made it to the Science tag! As a science aficionado, this of course makes me happy.

So lots of people have reblogged pointing out the irony that I didn’t even include the names of the scientists in my original post. This is mostly true. I did include their names on my post, but that was only in the tag section, and even then it was for my own reference purposes. Had I known this was going to be reblogged like mad and added to an educational category I, would have at least included links to their respective biographies and stuff, instead of only just my glib commentary.*

But that is what the edit feature is for, I suppose. SO HERE ARE SOME LINKS:

• Annie Jump Cannon
• Henrietta Swan
• Cecilia Payne

AND ALSO:

• Harvard Computers
• Edward Pickering
• Women in Astronomy

* Not that I will ever regret writing glib commentary about Neil deGrasse Tyson throwing some serious shade at the past.

ricktimus:

Neil deGrasse Tyson is not impressed with all your sexism.

Edit: This post made it to the Science tag! As a science aficionado, this of course makes me happy.

So lots of people have reblogged pointing out the irony that I didn’t even include the names of the scientists in my original post. This is mostly true. I did include their names on my post, but that was only in the tag section, and even then it was for my own reference purposes. Had I known this was going to be reblogged like mad and added to an educational category I, would have at least included links to their respective biographies and stuff, instead of only just my glib commentary.*

But that is what the edit feature is for, I suppose. SO HERE ARE SOME LINKS:

• Annie Jump Cannon
• Henrietta Swan
• Cecilia Payne

AND ALSO:

• Harvard Computers
• Edward Pickering
• Women in Astronomy

* Not that I will ever regret writing glib commentary about Neil deGrasse Tyson throwing some serious shade at the past.

ricktimus:

Neil deGrasse Tyson is not impressed with all your sexism.

Edit: This post made it to the Science tag! As a science aficionado, this of course makes me happy.

So lots of people have reblogged pointing out the irony that I didn’t even include the names of the scientists in my original post. This is mostly true. I did include their names on my post, but that was only in the tag section, and even then it was for my own reference purposes. Had I known this was going to be reblogged like mad and added to an educational category I, would have at least included links to their respective biographies and stuff, instead of only just my glib commentary.*

But that is what the edit feature is for, I suppose. SO HERE ARE SOME LINKS:

• Annie Jump Cannon
• Henrietta Swan
• Cecilia Payne

AND ALSO:

• Harvard Computers
• Edward Pickering
• Women in Astronomy

* Not that I will ever regret writing glib commentary about Neil deGrasse Tyson throwing some serious shade at the past.

ricktimus:

Neil deGrasse Tyson is not impressed with all your sexism.

Edit: This post made it to the Science tag! As a science aficionado, this of course makes me happy.

So lots of people have reblogged pointing out the irony that I didn’t even include the names of the scientists in my original post. This is mostly true. I did include their names on my post, but that was only in the tag section, and even then it was for my own reference purposes. Had I known this was going to be reblogged like mad and added to an educational category I, would have at least included links to their respective biographies and stuff, instead of only just my glib commentary.*

But that is what the edit feature is for, I suppose. SO HERE ARE SOME LINKS:

• Annie Jump Cannon
• Henrietta Swan
• Cecilia Payne

AND ALSO:

• Harvard Computers
• Edward Pickering
• Women in Astronomy

* Not that I will ever regret writing glib commentary about Neil deGrasse Tyson throwing some serious shade at the past.