Well, hopefully. Thing is, I’m still not sure if this is what they want, is it too descriptive? Does it truly evaluate anything? Problem is, I’m sick of it. I was sick of it when I first wrote it, I think it’s “a load of old shite”, and this time round I’m still sick of it. I’m less of a mess, but I’m still sick of it.
I’ve actually re-written the last 300 words today, to make it more evaluative in those 300 words, but to be honest, a big chunk of it is taken up with what it describes as Introduction, Implementation. My Evaluation and Conclusion are somewhat shorter. But I can’t think of any other ways to assess a teaching session.
*sigh*
The session is based on the best evidence currently available, it’s neat, it’s a good session, well recieved, etc, etc. Beyond a questionaire and so on, how do you assess it. I suppose I best get on. There’s words that need writing.
