Dear Donald Trump,
I’m a firm believer that politics should be kept out of our military and that our military should be kept out of politics. However, over the last week, a line was crossed not just between politics and our military but between personal ideology and human decency.
You recently told a crowd of your supporters, upon receiving a replica Purple Heart, that you’d, “always wanted to get the Purple Heart. This was much easier.”
Mr. Trump, I’m not a campaign manager. I can’t tell you how to run this race. But I say this as someone who knows you. I’ve met you before and you seemed as though you genuinely cared about my service and sacrifice. I wonder which version is the real you.
I am a proud post-9/11 U.S. Army veteran and Purple Heart recipient. When I first joined the military, like many other service members, I had dreams of serving valiantly and one day receiving many military accolades in service of our great nation.
In April 2003, the humvee I was driving outside of Karbala, Iraq, ran over a roadside bomb. The passengers were immediately ejected as a result of the blast, but I was trapped inside the burning vehicle for five minutes. I can tell you without equivocation that the one award I did not want to receive was a Purple Heart, but I got one anyway. And I’ll tell you now, I didn’t get mine the easy way.
I came home to my mother with third-degree burns over 33% of my body. I have had 30-plus surgeries to repair the skin grafts and tissue expanders since 2003. I came home a Purple Heart recipient, but my mother knew that we were only a few heartbeats away from giving her a new designation — a Gold Star.
So far you seem to have denigrated a prisoner of war, disparaged a four-star general who devoted his life to service, and disrespected the faith and the grief of a Gold Star family. Any one of these actions alone would otherwise disqualify a person auditioning for the role of our commander in chief.
I cannot understand why you have continually attempted to dishonor the memory of Army Captain Humayun Khan. You have repeatedly attempted to link him and his family to radical Islamic terrorism by even bringing their names up in the same sentence.
You say that you support our military, but your actions tell a different story. You assert that you have made sacrifices on par with the Khan family. I must ask you; do you truly understand the fundamental difference between investments and sacrifice?
Your reaction to his family’s emotional statement has shown me two things: First, you have a difficult time picking your battles. In the military, this is an important lesson that soldiers learn. You attended a military academy in your childhood and you are a businessman, so I know you understand this strategy.
If your response to this family had simply been to acknowledge their ultimate sacrifice and to say that as Americans, they are constitutionally entitled to their opinions, that would have been enough. You chose a different tactic. You chose to stay in the news cycle with your increasingly outrageous statements of condemnation of a family who, by all accounts, should absolutely be off limits.
How can we trust our military in the hands of a commander in chief who we can’t even trust to comfort the parents of a fallen soldier?
Second, your reaction also tells me that since you have difficulty dealing with the opinions of a private citizen of this country, you will almost certainly have a harder time in the world of global politics.
My 4-year-old daughter has a better sense of human empathy around this subject. When I take her to the park and other children stare at the scars that cover my face and arms, she takes my hand and encourages me to talk to those young children and explain why I look the way I look.
My hope is that your actions and words do not continue to erode our civil discourse. I pray that good people in this country continue to be shocked by your rhetoric because that means they agree that your words and actions have no place in society, much less in the Oval Office.
You have stated that all press is good press. It’s an interesting strategy that has thus far worked for you. But this, the memory of our fallen soldiers, their families, former POWs, and the proud recipients of the Purple Heart honor. This is not the position from which you should be getting your press. This is off-limits.
Please remember that the people you are speaking about, our brave men and women of the armed forces make up less than 1% of the population. However, if you become commander in chief, they will be the people who are going to fight for you regardless of personal politics. These are the people who will defend you. These are their families you are talking about. These are not the people you want to continue to carry out your petty grievances and personal attacks with.
I respectfully suggest you get a primer on the word sacrifice, as well as a lesson in human decency.
– J.R. Martinez (x) | follow @the-movemnt
it’s long, but please read this
Blog
-

-










Related: Albuquerque is also providing mobile showers to the homeless — and they’re doing it in a wonderfully sustainable way.
I just donated. Please consider donating too.
Link is here since MIC.COM cares more about traffic to their website rather than actually linking to the cause.
oh gosh this is so wonderful
-
On the same theme as @Plunderpuss’s admonition about bad “brushes”:
If you wish to encourage a child or loved one to pick up a musical instrument, please do not do it by buying a $90 “violin” from walmart or the like.
These things are NOT musical instruments. They’re known among musicians and luthiers as “VSOs” – Violin Shaped Objects – and they’re a sure ticket to convincing someone that they cannot play, will never be able to play, and should give up music entirely. That’s because those things are UNPLAYABLE.
If you have no money an actual violin shop is HELLA INTIMIDATING. I get that. My parents had no money, and they almost turned around and walked out of the violin shop before purchasing my first (half size, so adorbs) violin. Instead, they told the owner “We have $200 dollars and a little girl who wants to play. We can’t afford the monthly cost of renting. Is that totally unreasonable? Should we just leave?” And Carl, bless his heart, found me my first violin.
If $200 is too much, there are music teachers and school who will loan instruments and luthiers who will do payment plans. The point isn’t the exact amount spent; the point is that musical instruments are specialty equipment and there are unfortunately people out there looking to make a buck selling things that LOOK like instruments but aren’t, so ESPECIALLY if you’re not a musician yourself, you need to go to a specialist. Or, if you know someone who plays, bring them with you! Seriously, it’s not an imposition. Basically every musicker I know LOVES to be invited to test drive instruments.
I’ve been playing violin/fiddle for twenty four years. If I can’t get a halfway decent tone out of a violin, it is not actually a violin. It’s a VSO. And I get seriously worked up about the idea that there are kids out there convinced they can’t play because they were given garbage and expected to make music out of it.
-

IMG_20160803_205919 on Flickr.
Yes, definitely coming together.
-



savetheorphansfromthe-ball-pit:
ICYMI: In which a 13-year-old boy comes out to his best friend via text message, and adorable unconditional support ensues. Ain’t nothing wrong with being gay, my friend. (via BuzzFeed)
what makes it more adorable is he offered to call when he knew something was wrong
I also love how often the word bro was used
This is the proper way to be a bro.
# how to bro 101
-

I think I’ve just found the lightweight word processing device you need for the summer @shadesofmauve…
Thank you, I needed a chuckle. :P
(BTW, if anyone is wondering, I bought a chromebook that looks like it was made by Matel, and it’s working great for me. And is a haaaair smaller than this).
Smaller? Surely not possible!
(Also, this has a spare different-font-daisy wheel with it… Still not tempted? No?)
-
An asexual and pansexual become room-mates and have wacky adventures
The show is called ‘All or Nothing’
Plot twist: the asexual is really super outgoing and is a huge flirt while the pansexual is extremely socially awkward and has trouble ordering coffee let alone getting a date.
my hand slipped
will reblog until this becomes an actual show
Never not reblog
Netflix make it happen
-
I’m curious to know what is lost in translation! What nuance is English missing?? Also, oh man, just reading for the sake of reading is so liberating after a period of being stuck on a writing project.
For this, first we need a swedish lesson.
Tant is a value-neutral-to-positive word for an adult-to-elder woman (40+ at least), usually implies a fair amount of class and poise for adults (she’ll have modern haircut, be well-dressed with matching purse), gentleness for elders (still stylish, walking around with her purse in her walker, still ticking 20+ years after her hubby died). Generally translates to and from “aunt”.
Snusk is a wide-application word meaning filth, like filthy environment, filthy behaviour, etc. Also used as a wrinkle-nosed word for pr0n.
Compounding the two very value-dissonant words gets you a meaning somewhere along the lines of, “specialised dirty literature for ladies” or “the tmi stuff my grandma keeps in her drawer that I really don’t want to know about but secretly read anyway”.
That’s a wonderful, wonderful word.
Thank you for the Swedish lesson.


